Alright, so 2024 is supposed to be a big year for the Northern Lights, right? Solar maximum, they call it. I kept seeing stuff about it pop up, and it got me thinking. I’ve always wanted to see them properly, not just some faint green smudge people say is the aurora. So, I figured, this is the year. Time to actually figure out where the best spots really are, based on what I could find and what made sense for a regular person, you know?

My Starting Point: Just a Mess of Ideas
First off, I just kinda dove into the internet. Typed in the usual stuff, “best places northern lights 2024,” “aurora borealis hotspots,” that sort of thing. Man, the amount of information was crazy. Every travel site, every blog, everyone’s got an opinion. Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Canada, Alaska… even Scotland sometimes. It was overwhelming, honestly. Just a huge list of places, and a lot of fancy pictures that probably had the colors cranked way up.
I realized pretty quick that just reading top 10 lists wasn’t gonna cut it. They all say the same places, mostly. I needed to dig deeper. What makes a place actually good? Not just pretty pictures, but practical stuff.
Digging In: What Matters?
So, I started breaking it down. What was important to me?
- Dark Skies: This seemed obvious. Gotta get away from city lights. That ruled out trying to see them from downtown Reykjavik or Anchorage, probably. Needed places known for being remote or having specific dark sky parks.
- Likelihood: Where are they seen most often and most strongly? This meant looking at stuff about the “auroral oval” and which places sit right under it.
- Time of Year: Everyone says winter, obviously. Longer nights. But when in winter? September/October and February/March kept coming up as having clearer skies sometimes compared to mid-winter deep freeze clouds. Something to think about.
- Getting There & Staying There: How hard is it to reach these remote spots? And what about finding a place to sleep? Some places looked amazing but seemed like you needed a private plane and a survival expert. No thanks. I needed places a normal guy could actually manage.
- Things To Do Besides Waiting: Let’s be real, the lights aren’t guaranteed. Staring at a blank sky for a week sounds boring. So, places with other stuff to do during the day – maybe some nice scenery, hiking, dog sledding, whatever – seemed like a safer bet.
Filtering Down the Options
Armed with my little checklist, I went back to the big list of countries.
Iceland: Super popular, easy to get to flights-wise. Lots of tours. But also maybe too popular? And the weather can be really wild and change fast. Lots of coastline means maybe more clouds? Still a strong contender, especially for a first-timer maybe.

Norway (Tromsø, Lofoten): Kept seeing Tromsø mentioned. North of the Arctic Circle, lively little city. Lofoten Islands looked stunningly beautiful. Seemed like good infrastructure, tours available. Definitely high on the list.
Sweden (Abisko): Abisko kept popping up specifically because of its “blue hole” – apparently a spot where the weather tends to stay clearer than surrounding areas because of the mountains. That sounded promising. Less light pollution too. Felt a bit more focused just on the lights.
Finland (Lapland): Rovaniemi (Santa Claus village!), Saariselkä, Inari. Lots of options here. Famous for the glass igloos (though man, those look expensive). Seemed very geared towards winter tourism and aurora hunting. Good potential.
Canada (Yukon, Northwest Territories): Yellowknife often cited as the North American capital. Longer, colder winters maybe? Less accessible for me personally, maybe, flight-wise. But definitely under the prime aurora zone.
Alaska (Fairbanks): Similar to Canada, really. Fairbanks is the main hub people mentioned. Again, logistics felt a bit more involved from where I am, but definitely a classic choice.

My Personal Shortlist for 2024 Research
After all that digging and thinking about what I wanted – good chance of seeing them, reasonably accessible, stuff to do – I kind of narrowed it down in my head. This isn’t a definitive “best” list, just what felt right based on my process:
- Tromsø, Norway: Seemed like a good balance of accessibility, infrastructure, tour options, and being far north. Plus, other cool Arctic stuff to see.
- Abisko, Sweden: That “blue hole” weather phenomenon sounded really appealing for boosting chances of clear skies. More focused on the lights themselves.
- Finnish Lapland (Inari region maybe): Felt like a good mix of dedicated aurora focus and unique winter experiences. Lots of options for lodging away from town lights.
Iceland is still hovering there as a maybe, just because it’s Iceland, you know? But the cloud cover worries me a bit. Canada and Alaska felt like a bigger trip commitment for now.
So yeah, that’s where my head’s at. Started with a vague idea, got swamped with info, tried to figure out what actually mattered to me, and ended up with a shorter list to really look into for booking something. It was a process, just sifting through it all. Now the next step is actually looking at flights and dates for one of those top three. Still feels like a bit of a gamble, but hey, that’s part of the adventure, right?