Alright, so today I’m gonna walk you through my experience messing around with “p e airport”. Yeah, I know, the name’s a bit cryptic, but bear with me. It all started with me needing a super simple way to expose some internal services securely. I was tired of wrestling with complex 加速器 setups and wanted something cleaner and more lightweight.

First things first, I started by researching a bunch of different options. I looked at everything from full-blown API gateways to simple reverse proxies. “p e airport” kept popping up in discussions, and the promise of easy setup and secure access intrigued me. So, I decided to give it a shot.
Diving in, I grabbed the latest release from their GitHub page. The installation was surprisingly straightforward. Basically, it involved downloading the binary and making it executable. Nothing fancy there.
Next up, configuring “p e airport”. This is where I spent most of my time. The configuration is done via a YAML file, which is pretty standard. I needed to define the upstream services I wanted to expose, along with the authentication mechanisms. I opted for a simple username/password setup to begin with.
Here’s a snippet of my initial config:
service1:
upstream: http://localhost:8080
auth:
type: basic
users:
- name: myuser
password: mypassword
Firing up the “p e airport” server was as easy as running the executable with the config file as an argument. To my surprise, it worked on the first try! I was able to access my service via the “p e airport” endpoint, and the basic authentication kicked in as expected.

Of course, it wasn’t all smooth sailing. I ran into a few hiccups along the way. Debugging was mostly done by looking at the server logs. It took me a bit to figure out the right syntax for some of the more advanced configuration options, like setting custom headers and rate limiting.
Adding more services was a breeze. I simply added more entries to the YAML config file and restarted the server. The “p e airport” server automatically picked up the changes and started routing traffic to the new services.
Securing the “p e airport” server itself was the next priority. I configured it to listen on HTTPS and set up TLS certificates using Let’s Encrypt. This was a bit more involved, but the documentation was pretty clear, and I managed to get it working without too much trouble.
Putting it all together, I now have a simple and secure way to access my internal services. “p e airport” has proven to be a valuable tool in my toolbox. It’s not perfect, but it’s definitely a solid option for simple reverse proxying and authentication.
One thing I learned is the importance of good documentation. The “p e airport” docs were pretty good, but there were a few areas where they could be improved. I’m considering contributing back to the project with some documentation updates.

Final thoughts: “p e airport” is a surprisingly capable tool for its size. It’s easy to set up, easy to configure, and it does exactly what it says on the tin. If you’re looking for a simple way to expose internal services securely, I highly recommend giving it a try.